PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding LTCG computation on sale of land and building where assessee held 1/4th share. AO computed capital gains using stamp duty valuation despite assessee's objections to stamp valuation authority's report. DVO valuation report determined property value at Rs.12,07,89,700, making assessee's share Rs.3,01,97,425. Since difference between DVO valuation and assessee's declared consideration was less than 5% of sale consideration, safe harbour provisions under third proviso of Section 50C applied for AY 2012-13. CIT(A) correctly considered DVO valuation report of co-owner and ruled in assessee's favour. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, recognizing proper application of safe harbour rule and rejecting AO's reliance on disputed stamp duty valuation.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding LTCG computation on sale of land and building where assessee held 1/4th share. AO computed capital gains using stamp duty valuation despite assessee's objections to stamp valuation authority's report. DVO valuation report determined property value at Rs.12,07,89,700, making assessee's share Rs.3,01,97,425. Since difference between DVO valuation and assessee's declared consideration was less than 5% of sale consideration, safe harbour provisions under third proviso of Section 50C applied for AY 2012-13. CIT(A) correctly considered DVO valuation report of co-owner and ruled in assessee's favour. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, recognizing proper application of safe harbour rule and rejecting AO's reliance on disputed stamp duty valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
