Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of a charitable entity challenging denial of exemption under section 11. The assessee accumulated funds during FY 2016-17 and utilized them in the sixth year (FY 2022-23). CPC treated the unutilized amount as deemed income in AY 2023-24. ITAT held that since utilization occurred before 31.03.2023, within the year immediately following the prescribed five-year period, and amendments to section 11(3) were prospective, taxation was improper. The tribunal ruled that if taxation was warranted, it should have occurred in AY 2022-23 when the five-year period expired on 31.03.2022, not in AY 2023-24. ITAT set aside the lower authority's order and directed deletion of the adjustment, allowing the assessee's grounds.
ITAT allowed the appeal of a charitable entity challenging denial of exemption under section 11. The assessee accumulated funds during FY 2016-17 and utilized them in the sixth year (FY 2022-23). CPC treated the unutilized amount as deemed income in AY 2023-24. ITAT held that since utilization occurred before 31.03.2023, within the year immediately following the prescribed five-year period, and amendments to section 11(3) were prospective, taxation was improper. The tribunal ruled that if taxation was warranted, it should have occurred in AY 2022-23 when the five-year period expired on 31.03.2022, not in AY 2023-24. ITAT set aside the lower authority's order and directed deletion of the adjustment, allowing the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.