Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal against PCIT's revision order under Section 263. The tribunal found that while PCIT correctly identified AO's failure to examine applicability of Section 43CA regarding differences between stamp duty values and agreement values for property transactions, the revision was sustainable only for two transactions where differences exceeded tolerance bands. For five transactions, no Section 43CA addition was warranted, making the assessment order non-erroneous. ITAT rejected assessee's contention that Section 43CA should be applied by aggregating all transactions, clarifying that each transaction must be examined individually. The tribunal upheld PCIT's order regarding two transactions where AO failed proper inquiry despite apparent discrepancies, but set aside revision for remaining five transactions where assessment was not erroneous.
ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal against PCIT's revision order under Section 263. The tribunal found that while PCIT correctly identified AO's failure to examine applicability of Section 43CA regarding differences between stamp duty values and agreement values for property transactions, the revision was sustainable only for two transactions where differences exceeded tolerance bands. For five transactions, no Section 43CA addition was warranted, making the assessment order non-erroneous. ITAT rejected assessee's contention that Section 43CA should be applied by aggregating all transactions, clarifying that each transaction must be examined individually. The tribunal upheld PCIT's order regarding two transactions where AO failed proper inquiry despite apparent discrepancies, but set aside revision for remaining five transactions where assessment was not erroneous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.