Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside CIT(A) order and remanded assessment u/s 144 back to AO for de novo proceedings. Deceased assessee failed to file return for AY 2017-18, resulting in best judgment assessment with additions u/s 69A for specified bank notes deposited during demonetization and business income estimated at 8%. Assessee was hospitalized in ICU due to severe diabetes and stroke when assessment order was passed, subsequently dying on 18.05.2021. ITAT found denial of proper opportunity violated natural justice principles. Relying on TIN Box Co precedent, tribunal directed AO to conduct fresh assessment after providing adequate hearing opportunity. Assessee's representative undertook to substantiate SBN sources and challenge 8% business income estimation. Penalties u/s 271B and 271AAC(1) also remanded for fresh consideration post de novo assessment.
ITAT set aside CIT(A) order and remanded assessment u/s 144 back to AO for de novo proceedings. Deceased assessee failed to file return for AY 2017-18, resulting in best judgment assessment with additions u/s 69A for specified bank notes deposited during demonetization and business income estimated at 8%. Assessee was hospitalized in ICU due to severe diabetes and stroke when assessment order was passed, subsequently dying on 18.05.2021. ITAT found denial of proper opportunity violated natural justice principles. Relying on TIN Box Co precedent, tribunal directed AO to conduct fresh assessment after providing adequate hearing opportunity. Assessee's representative undertook to substantiate SBN sources and challenge 8% business income estimation. Penalties u/s 271B and 271AAC(1) also remanded for fresh consideration post de novo assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.