Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal for statistical purposes regarding addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits allegedly from vegetable and milk sales. Tribunal found assessee failed to provide documentary evidence of milk and vegetable supplies across India, transportation proof, or satisfactory explanation for frequent cash withdrawals following deposits. However, ITAT accepted assessee's legal contention that cash deposits cannot be treated as undisclosed income without crediting prior withdrawals from the same bank account, unless revenue demonstrates alternative utilization of withdrawn cash. Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for verification and determination per established legal principles requiring credit for withdrawals when assessing unexplained deposits in identical bank accounts.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal for statistical purposes regarding addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits allegedly from vegetable and milk sales. Tribunal found assessee failed to provide documentary evidence of milk and vegetable supplies across India, transportation proof, or satisfactory explanation for frequent cash withdrawals following deposits. However, ITAT accepted assessee's legal contention that cash deposits cannot be treated as undisclosed income without crediting prior withdrawals from the same bank account, unless revenue demonstrates alternative utilization of withdrawn cash. Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for verification and determination per established legal principles requiring credit for withdrawals when assessing unexplained deposits in identical bank accounts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.