Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed confiscation order under section 112(a)(i) of Customs Act, 1962 for concealing foreign currency seized from petitioner arriving from USA. The ex-parte order violated principles of natural justice as customs authorities failed to serve show-cause notice at petitioner's USA address disclosed in statement and passport, instead relying on insufficient local address at Anand. Court rejected respondent's excuse regarding returned notice marked "insufficient address" and reliance on section 153(e) for substituted service through notice board affixation. Matter remanded to customs authorities for fresh de novo proceedings after providing proper opportunity of hearing to petitioner in accordance with law.
HC quashed confiscation order under section 112(a)(i) of Customs Act, 1962 for concealing foreign currency seized from petitioner arriving from USA. The ex-parte order violated principles of natural justice as customs authorities failed to serve show-cause notice at petitioner's USA address disclosed in statement and passport, instead relying on insufficient local address at Anand. Court rejected respondent's excuse regarding returned notice marked "insufficient address" and reliance on section 153(e) for substituted service through notice board affixation. Matter remanded to customs authorities for fresh de novo proceedings after providing proper opportunity of hearing to petitioner in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
