Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revenue loses appeal as concessional customs duty allowed for project imports under provisional assessment despite lacking final mega power status at clearance
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging concessional customs duty benefit under S.No.400 of Notification 21/2002-Cus for project imports. Respondent imported goods under provisional assessment for mega power project lacking final mega power status at clearance. CESTAT held final mega power certificate dated 01.02.2012 constituted substantive compliance and represented continuation of earlier in-principle/provisional status. Tribunal ruled provisional assessment under Section 18 permits duty modification upon finalization when notification benefits become available. Since project qualified as mega power plant with required capacity and regulatory compliance, retrospective application of concessional duty was permissible. Revenue's contention that final status must exist at import clearance was rejected, establishing precedent for provisional assessment flexibility in project imports.
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging concessional customs duty benefit under S.No.400 of Notification 21/2002-Cus for project imports. Respondent imported goods under provisional assessment for mega power project lacking final mega power status at clearance. CESTAT held final mega power certificate dated 01.02.2012 constituted substantive compliance and represented continuation of earlier in-principle/provisional status. Tribunal ruled provisional assessment under Section 18 permits duty modification upon finalization when notification benefits become available. Since project qualified as mega power plant with required capacity and regulatory compliance, retrospective application of concessional duty was permissible. Revenue's contention that final status must exist at import clearance was rejected, establishing precedent for provisional assessment flexibility in project imports.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.