Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revenue loses appeal as concessional customs duty allowed for project imports under provisional assessment despite lacking final mega power status at clearance
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging concessional customs duty benefit under S.No.400 of Notification 21/2002-Cus for project imports. Respondent imported goods under provisional assessment for mega power project lacking final mega power status at clearance. CESTAT held final mega power certificate dated 01.02.2012 constituted substantive compliance and represented continuation of earlier in-principle/provisional status. Tribunal ruled provisional assessment under Section 18 permits duty modification upon finalization when notification benefits become available. Since project qualified as mega power plant with required capacity and regulatory compliance, retrospective application of concessional duty was permissible. Revenue's contention that final status must exist at import clearance was rejected, establishing precedent for provisional assessment flexibility in project imports.
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging concessional customs duty benefit under S.No.400 of Notification 21/2002-Cus for project imports. Respondent imported goods under provisional assessment for mega power project lacking final mega power status at clearance. CESTAT held final mega power certificate dated 01.02.2012 constituted substantive compliance and represented continuation of earlier in-principle/provisional status. Tribunal ruled provisional assessment under Section 18 permits duty modification upon finalization when notification benefits become available. Since project qualified as mega power plant with required capacity and regulatory compliance, retrospective application of concessional duty was permissible. Revenue's contention that final status must exist at import clearance was rejected, establishing precedent for provisional assessment flexibility in project imports.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
