Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC challenged SCN issued under Section 122(1)(xviii) read with Section 35(6) of WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 regarding seizure of goods without recording satisfaction as mandated under Section 67. Petitioner exclusively supplies goods to Ministry of Defence with subsisting work orders for Indian Army. Court directed petitioner may seek goods release by furnishing bank guarantee equivalent to 20% of proposed penalty amount in SCN dated 27th May, 2025. Upon written application with requisite bank guarantee, proper officer must release goods within three working days. Court noted SCN appears issued under Section 122 read with Section 35(6), requiring proceedings under Section 73 or 74. Final decision on SCN restrained without court's leave. Matter listed for July 2025 consideration.
HC challenged SCN issued under Section 122(1)(xviii) read with Section 35(6) of WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 regarding seizure of goods without recording satisfaction as mandated under Section 67. Petitioner exclusively supplies goods to Ministry of Defence with subsisting work orders for Indian Army. Court directed petitioner may seek goods release by furnishing bank guarantee equivalent to 20% of proposed penalty amount in SCN dated 27th May, 2025. Upon written application with requisite bank guarantee, proper officer must release goods within three working days. Court noted SCN appears issued under Section 122 read with Section 35(6), requiring proceedings under Section 73 or 74. Final decision on SCN restrained without court's leave. Matter listed for July 2025 consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
