Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned orders dated 12.03.2025 for violating principles of natural justice and contravening Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act. The respondent authority rejected the petitioner's reply as unacceptable and confirmed defects without providing mandatory opportunity of hearing required under the statutory provision when adverse decisions are contemplated against taxpayers. The court found the orders procedurally flawed as they failed to comply with natural justice requirements and statutory mandates. The petition was allowed by way of remand, directing the respondent to undertake fresh consideration of the matter while ensuring compliance with due process requirements and providing adequate hearing opportunity to the petitioner before making any adverse determination.
The HC set aside the impugned orders dated 12.03.2025 for violating principles of natural justice and contravening Section 75(4) of the TNGST Act. The respondent authority rejected the petitioner's reply as unacceptable and confirmed defects without providing mandatory opportunity of hearing required under the statutory provision when adverse decisions are contemplated against taxpayers. The court found the orders procedurally flawed as they failed to comply with natural justice requirements and statutory mandates. The petition was allowed by way of remand, directing the respondent to undertake fresh consideration of the matter while ensuring compliance with due process requirements and providing adequate hearing opportunity to the petitioner before making any adverse determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
