Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petitioner's application under section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing Form 67 under Rule 128. The petitioner had received salary income from Bangladesh with tax duly paid but failed to submit the required Form 67 before the return filing due date. Despite the Department Representative arguing no genuine hardship was demonstrated, the HC held that filing forms for claiming statutory benefits is procedural in nature, following established precedents. The Court distinguished this case from technical non-compliance situations, emphasizing that procedural requirements should not defeat substantive rights when the underlying tax obligation was properly discharged. The assessee's appeal was allowed, granting relief from the delayed form submission.
The HC allowed the petitioner's application under section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing Form 67 under Rule 128. The petitioner had received salary income from Bangladesh with tax duly paid but failed to submit the required Form 67 before the return filing due date. Despite the Department Representative arguing no genuine hardship was demonstrated, the HC held that filing forms for claiming statutory benefits is procedural in nature, following established precedents. The Court distinguished this case from technical non-compliance situations, emphasizing that procedural requirements should not defeat substantive rights when the underlying tax obligation was properly discharged. The assessee's appeal was allowed, granting relief from the delayed form submission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
