Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) is not allowable for interest income earned from investments with cooperative banks. The tribunal ruled that exemption provisions must be strictly interpreted and distinguished cooperative banks from cooperative societies per se. Relying on Karnataka High Court precedents in Bangalore Club and Totagars cases, which followed Supreme Court judgment, ITAT determined that cooperative banks are treated at par with scheduled banks under sub-section (4) of section 80P. The deduction is available only for interest received from cooperative societies, not cooperative banks. Revenue's appeal was allowed, CIT(A)'s order was set aside, and AO's order was confirmed.
ITAT held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) is not allowable for interest income earned from investments with cooperative banks. The tribunal ruled that exemption provisions must be strictly interpreted and distinguished cooperative banks from cooperative societies per se. Relying on Karnataka High Court precedents in Bangalore Club and Totagars cases, which followed Supreme Court judgment, ITAT determined that cooperative banks are treated at par with scheduled banks under sub-section (4) of section 80P. The deduction is available only for interest received from cooperative societies, not cooperative banks. Revenue's appeal was allowed, CIT(A)'s order was set aside, and AO's order was confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.