Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments on software development services and ECB interest payments. For SDS benchmarking, ITAT held TPO/DRP erred by including five high-turnover comparables (Infosys, Wipro, Larsen & Turbo Infotech, Mindtree, Tata Elxsi) without applying turnover filter. Matter remanded to TPO for fresh benchmarking using ten-times turnover filter range. Regarding INR-denominated ECB interest, ITAT ruled TPO incorrectly rejected assessee's SBI-PLR benchmarking approach in favor of Masala Bond rates. Following precedents including Adama India and Invesco India, ITAT held INR-denominated loans should be benchmarked against domestic Indian rupee lending rates, not external rates carrying different lender risks. Assessee's 10.45% interest rate against SBI-PLR 13.75% deemed arm's length. TP adjustment vacated. AO directed to verify advance tax credit claim per 26AS disclosure.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments on software development services and ECB interest payments. For SDS benchmarking, ITAT held TPO/DRP erred by including five high-turnover comparables (Infosys, Wipro, Larsen & Turbo Infotech, Mindtree, Tata Elxsi) without applying turnover filter. Matter remanded to TPO for fresh benchmarking using ten-times turnover filter range. Regarding INR-denominated ECB interest, ITAT ruled TPO incorrectly rejected assessee's SBI-PLR benchmarking approach in favor of Masala Bond rates. Following precedents including Adama India and Invesco India, ITAT held INR-denominated loans should be benchmarked against domestic Indian rupee lending rates, not external rates carrying different lender risks. Assessee's 10.45% interest rate against SBI-PLR 13.75% deemed arm's length. TP adjustment vacated. AO directed to verify advance tax credit claim per 26AS disclosure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.