Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed proceedings against petitioners under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheque issued by accused Cooperative Society. Court held that complainant failed to establish primary requirement under Section 141(1) by not alleging in complaint that petitioners were in charge of and responsible for Society's business conduct at time of offence commission. Mere general statements about managing affairs insufficient without specific allegations of charge and responsibility. Following Supreme Court precedent in Ravi Dhingra case, Court found prosecution against Managing Director and Authorised Signatory prima facie unsustainable due to absence of essential allegations. Petition allowed, proceedings quashed.
HC quashed proceedings against petitioners under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheque issued by accused Cooperative Society. Court held that complainant failed to establish primary requirement under Section 141(1) by not alleging in complaint that petitioners were in charge of and responsible for Society's business conduct at time of offence commission. Mere general statements about managing affairs insufficient without specific allegations of charge and responsibility. Following Supreme Court precedent in Ravi Dhingra case, Court found prosecution against Managing Director and Authorised Signatory prima facie unsustainable due to absence of essential allegations. Petition allowed, proceedings quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
