Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC ruled that the CJM possesses authority to extend the period of Writ of Commission beyond the initial 90-day limit for taking possession of secured assets under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, without requiring financial institutions to file fresh applications. The petitioner financial institution challenged the CJM's practice of refusing extensions and mandating new Section 14 applications after the 90-day period expired. Relying on SC precedent in NKGSB Co-operative Bank Limited v. Subir Chakravarty, the HC held that once an order directing a Court Commissioner to deliver possession is passed, the CJM may grant extensions if execution cannot be completed within the prescribed timeframe. The application was disposed of, affirming the CJM's discretionary power to extend commission periods.
The HC ruled that the CJM possesses authority to extend the period of Writ of Commission beyond the initial 90-day limit for taking possession of secured assets under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, without requiring financial institutions to file fresh applications. The petitioner financial institution challenged the CJM's practice of refusing extensions and mandating new Section 14 applications after the 90-day period expired. Relying on SC precedent in NKGSB Co-operative Bank Limited v. Subir Chakravarty, the HC held that once an order directing a Court Commissioner to deliver possession is passed, the CJM may grant extensions if execution cannot be completed within the prescribed timeframe. The application was disposed of, affirming the CJM's discretionary power to extend commission periods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
