Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC disposed of writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders in Form GST ASMT 14 for assessment years 2017-18, 2019-20, and 2020-21. The petitioner failed to file appeals before ADC (GST) Appeals within the statutory 90-day limitation period. Despite the Supreme Court's position against entertaining writ petitions after limitation expiry, the HC followed its consistent practice of allowing petitioners to file statutory appeals under similar circumstances. The court permitted the petitioner to file statutory appeal within 30 days from receipt of the order, subject to pre-depositing 25% of disputed tax through Electronic Cash Register or demand draft. The writ petitions were disposed of at admission stage with these conditions.
The HC disposed of writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders in Form GST ASMT 14 for assessment years 2017-18, 2019-20, and 2020-21. The petitioner failed to file appeals before ADC (GST) Appeals within the statutory 90-day limitation period. Despite the Supreme Court's position against entertaining writ petitions after limitation expiry, the HC followed its consistent practice of allowing petitioners to file statutory appeals under similar circumstances. The court permitted the petitioner to file statutory appeal within 30 days from receipt of the order, subject to pre-depositing 25% of disputed tax through Electronic Cash Register or demand draft. The writ petitions were disposed of at admission stage with these conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
