Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under section 147, where petitioner failed to respond to show-cause notices issued under section 148A regarding undisclosed materials and transactions. Court held that since petitioner received departmental notice but chose not to contest before Competent Authority and final assessment order was already passed, it was inappropriate to invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226. HC determined that grounds raised could be addressed before Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Decision aligned with previous ruling involving same petitioner for different assessment year, where statutory remedies were deemed adequate. Writ petition dismissed with direction to pursue available appellate remedies under the Act.
HC dismissed writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under section 147, where petitioner failed to respond to show-cause notices issued under section 148A regarding undisclosed materials and transactions. Court held that since petitioner received departmental notice but chose not to contest before Competent Authority and final assessment order was already passed, it was inappropriate to invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226. HC determined that grounds raised could be addressed before Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Decision aligned with previous ruling involving same petitioner for different assessment year, where statutory remedies were deemed adequate. Writ petition dismissed with direction to pursue available appellate remedies under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
