Natural justice in insolvency-professional discipline requires disclosed material; notices based on extraneous material and ignored defences are vitia...
Development rights transfers treated as immovable property, while construction abatement applies and repeated non-payment permits extended service-tax...
HC dismissed writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under section 147, where petitioner failed to respond to show-cause notices issued under section 148A regarding undisclosed materials and transactions. Court held that since petitioner received departmental notice but chose not to contest before Competent Authority and final assessment order was already passed, it was inappropriate to invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226. HC determined that grounds raised could be addressed before Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Decision aligned with previous ruling involving same petitioner for different assessment year, where statutory remedies were deemed adequate. Writ petition dismissed with direction to pursue available appellate remedies under the Act.
HC dismissed writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under section 147, where petitioner failed to respond to show-cause notices issued under section 148A regarding undisclosed materials and transactions. Court held that since petitioner received departmental notice but chose not to contest before Competent Authority and final assessment order was already passed, it was inappropriate to invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226. HC determined that grounds raised could be addressed before Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Decision aligned with previous ruling involving same petitioner for different assessment year, where statutory remedies were deemed adequate. Writ petition dismissed with direction to pursue available appellate remedies under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.