Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC set aside notice u/s 148 and remanded matter to assessing officer for fresh decision. Court held that procedural safeguards u/s 148A require meaningful opportunity of hearing, not mere formality. Assessing officer violated principles of natural justice by rejecting petitioner's response without providing adequate reasons or substantiating why audited accounts were unacceptable despite credible information from high risk transactions module indicating escaped assessment. Court emphasized that when rejecting assessee's contentions, appropriate reasons must be provided explaining why response is unacceptable. Notice and impugned order cannot be sustained without compliance with mandatory procedural requirements ensuring effective hearing opportunity.
HC set aside notice u/s 148 and remanded matter to assessing officer for fresh decision. Court held that procedural safeguards u/s 148A require meaningful opportunity of hearing, not mere formality. Assessing officer violated principles of natural justice by rejecting petitioner's response without providing adequate reasons or substantiating why audited accounts were unacceptable despite credible information from high risk transactions module indicating escaped assessment. Court emphasized that when rejecting assessee's contentions, appropriate reasons must be provided explaining why response is unacceptable. Notice and impugned order cannot be sustained without compliance with mandatory procedural requirements ensuring effective hearing opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.