Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s order quashing assessment u/s 153A. Tribunal held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be sustained against person in whose name search warrant was not issued under section 132. Since search action was not initiated against the assessee, AO lacked jurisdiction to assume proceedings u/s 153A. Following precedent in Sanjay Jain case with identical facts and circumstances, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s decision quashing the reopening proceedings. Revenue's contention regarding assumption of jurisdiction was rejected, and assessee's appeal was allowed on grounds of procedural impropriety in initiating assessment without proper search warrant authorization.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s order quashing assessment u/s 153A. Tribunal held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be sustained against person in whose name search warrant was not issued under section 132. Since search action was not initiated against the assessee, AO lacked jurisdiction to assume proceedings u/s 153A. Following precedent in Sanjay Jain case with identical facts and circumstances, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s decision quashing the reopening proceedings. Revenue's contention regarding assumption of jurisdiction was rejected, and assessee's appeal was allowed on grounds of procedural impropriety in initiating assessment without proper search warrant authorization.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.