Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held reassessment notice u/s 148 invalid where income escaped assessment was Rs. 22,32,379, below the Rs. 50,00,000 threshold required under Section 149(1)(b) for reopening beyond three years. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention that total sale consideration should be considered, emphasizing that only income chargeable to tax which escaped assessment for the specific year determines validity. Relying on Sanath Kumar Murali precedent, ITAT clarified the threshold applies to escaped income for the impugned year, not entire transaction value. Since escaped assessment quantum fell significantly below statutory limit, notice was quashed as bad in law. Consequential assessment order was also invalidated, rendering remaining grounds academic. Assessee's appeal allowed entirely.
ITAT held reassessment notice u/s 148 invalid where income escaped assessment was Rs. 22,32,379, below the Rs. 50,00,000 threshold required under Section 149(1)(b) for reopening beyond three years. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention that total sale consideration should be considered, emphasizing that only income chargeable to tax which escaped assessment for the specific year determines validity. Relying on Sanath Kumar Murali precedent, ITAT clarified the threshold applies to escaped income for the impugned year, not entire transaction value. Since escaped assessment quantum fell significantly below statutory limit, notice was quashed as bad in law. Consequential assessment order was also invalidated, rendering remaining grounds academic. Assessee's appeal allowed entirely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.