Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for appellant engaged in software development services to associated enterprise on cost-plus markup basis. Tribunal excluded six companies from comparables: Tata Elxsi Limited due to diversified activities including animation/VFX services creating functional dissimilarity; Persistent Systems Limited for functional dissimilarity and being giant company; Aspire Systems for extraordinary amalgamation event and turnover filter; Infosys Limited as captive service provider incomparable to appellant's cost-plus model; Thirdware Solutions for functional differences and intangible asset ownership; Cybage Software for providing different services. However, Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were retained as comparables since appellant originally selected them in transfer pricing documentation. Regarding bad debt provisions, ITAT upheld that provisions are not operating expenses for profit level indicator computation, distinguishing from actual write-offs.
ITAT ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for appellant engaged in software development services to associated enterprise on cost-plus markup basis. Tribunal excluded six companies from comparables: Tata Elxsi Limited due to diversified activities including animation/VFX services creating functional dissimilarity; Persistent Systems Limited for functional dissimilarity and being giant company; Aspire Systems for extraordinary amalgamation event and turnover filter; Infosys Limited as captive service provider incomparable to appellant's cost-plus model; Thirdware Solutions for functional differences and intangible asset ownership; Cybage Software for providing different services. However, Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were retained as comparables since appellant originally selected them in transfer pricing documentation. Regarding bad debt provisions, ITAT upheld that provisions are not operating expenses for profit level indicator computation, distinguishing from actual write-offs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
