Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded seven companies (Tata Elexis Limited, E-Infochips Ltd, Larsen and Tourbo Infotech Limited, Infosys Ltd, Persistent Systems Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Thirdware Solutions Limited) from comparables following precedent, while retaining R S Software due to functional similarity. Mindtree Limited was excluded due to diverse service offerings and lack of segmental data. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Akshya Software and Sagar Soft as comparables but rejected Sankhya Infotech due to high R&D expenditure. Working capital adjustment was granted using average opening-closing balances. For interest on trade receivables, separate benchmarking was mandated at LIBOR plus 200 basis points with 60-day credit period. MAT credit was allowed subject to verification.
ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded seven companies (Tata Elexis Limited, E-Infochips Ltd, Larsen and Tourbo Infotech Limited, Infosys Ltd, Persistent Systems Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Thirdware Solutions Limited) from comparables following precedent, while retaining R S Software due to functional similarity. Mindtree Limited was excluded due to diverse service offerings and lack of segmental data. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Akshya Software and Sagar Soft as comparables but rejected Sankhya Infotech due to high R&D expenditure. Working capital adjustment was granted using average opening-closing balances. For interest on trade receivables, separate benchmarking was mandated at LIBOR plus 200 basis points with 60-day credit period. MAT credit was allowed subject to verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.