Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding bogus purchase additions. The assessee joined M/s. Gauri Construction as partner in AY 2011-12 when it converted from proprietorship to firm. Commercial tax authorities subsequently identified bogus transactions of M/s. Gauri Construction for AY 2010-11, which were incorrectly tagged to the assessee's PAN despite occurring before partnership formation. CIT(A) correctly determined that since all evidence related to M/s. Gauri Construction's transactions, the AO lacked justification for making adverse inferences against the assessee personally. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition, finding no basis for attributing pre-partnership transactions to the individual assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding bogus purchase additions. The assessee joined M/s. Gauri Construction as partner in AY 2011-12 when it converted from proprietorship to firm. Commercial tax authorities subsequently identified bogus transactions of M/s. Gauri Construction for AY 2010-11, which were incorrectly tagged to the assessee's PAN despite occurring before partnership formation. CIT(A) correctly determined that since all evidence related to M/s. Gauri Construction's transactions, the AO lacked justification for making adverse inferences against the assessee personally. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition, finding no basis for attributing pre-partnership transactions to the individual assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
