Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging an appellate order, finding violation of natural justice principles as the petitioner lacked adequate notice and was not served with the appeal petition and grounds. The appellate authority passed a non-speaking order without conducting necessary enquiry as mandated under Section 107(11) and (12) of the Act. While the appellate authority correctly identified the adjudicating authority's failure to examine Input Tax Credit legality and pass a speaking order, it failed to make further enquiry for a firm decision. The HC set aside both the impugned appellate order and the underlying adjudicating authority's order dated 30th October 2023, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The petition was disposed of.
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging an appellate order, finding violation of natural justice principles as the petitioner lacked adequate notice and was not served with the appeal petition and grounds. The appellate authority passed a non-speaking order without conducting necessary enquiry as mandated under Section 107(11) and (12) of the Act. While the appellate authority correctly identified the adjudicating authority's failure to examine Input Tax Credit legality and pass a speaking order, it failed to make further enquiry for a firm decision. The HC set aside both the impugned appellate order and the underlying adjudicating authority's order dated 30th October 2023, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
