Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC allowed petitioner to file reply to six-month-old show cause notice challenging GST registration cancellation under Rule 21(b) for issuing invoices without actual supply of goods or services. Court directed petitioner to disclose any pending CGST proceedings including input tax credit matters in reply by 1st July 2025. DGST must decide within one month of reply submission and may verify pending CGST proceedings against petitioner. Petition disposed of with directions for administrative resolution rather than judicial determination of substantive GST violation allegations.
HC allowed petitioner to file reply to six-month-old show cause notice challenging GST registration cancellation under Rule 21(b) for issuing invoices without actual supply of goods or services. Court directed petitioner to disclose any pending CGST proceedings including input tax credit matters in reply by 1st July 2025. DGST must decide within one month of reply submission and may verify pending CGST proceedings against petitioner. Petition disposed of with directions for administrative resolution rather than judicial determination of substantive GST violation allegations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
