Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.