Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal, reversing two significant disallowances while dismissing one ground. Regarding the Rs. 2,60,67,039 disallowance under section 43B, the tribunal held that since no GST deduction was claimed as operating expenses and no GST liability existed as of 31.3.2018, the disallowance based on an incorrect tax audit report was unjustified. For the section 36(1)(va) disallowance concerning delayed PF deposits, the tribunal ruled that depositing PF contributions on the next working day after the due date fell on Sunday constituted timely payment under legal principles governing office closures. The ground regarding erroneous basic tax rate claim was dismissed as not pressed by the taxpayer's representative during proceedings.
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal, reversing two significant disallowances while dismissing one ground. Regarding the Rs. 2,60,67,039 disallowance under section 43B, the tribunal held that since no GST deduction was claimed as operating expenses and no GST liability existed as of 31.3.2018, the disallowance based on an incorrect tax audit report was unjustified. For the section 36(1)(va) disallowance concerning delayed PF deposits, the tribunal ruled that depositing PF contributions on the next working day after the due date fell on Sunday constituted timely payment under legal principles governing office closures. The ground regarding erroneous basic tax rate claim was dismissed as not pressed by the taxpayer's representative during proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.