Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.