Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
