Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders regarding classification of imported Quicklime. The Tribunal held that Quicklime with Calcium Oxide purity less than 98% as declared in Bills of Entry must be classified under Customs Tariff Item No. 2522 1000 rather than CTH 2825 9090 under Section 17(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. Following precedent established in JSW Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin, CESTAT determined that products with 92% purity fall under CTH 2522 1000. The classification dispute was resolved in favor of the appellant based on chemical analysis demonstrating purity below the 98% threshold required for alternative classification.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders regarding classification of imported Quicklime. The Tribunal held that Quicklime with Calcium Oxide purity less than 98% as declared in Bills of Entry must be classified under Customs Tariff Item No. 2522 1000 rather than CTH 2825 9090 under Section 17(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. Following precedent established in JSW Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin, CESTAT determined that products with 92% purity fall under CTH 2522 1000. The classification dispute was resolved in favor of the appellant based on chemical analysis demonstrating purity below the 98% threshold required for alternative classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.