Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal held that ED need not conduct independent investigation into predicate offences, only identifying glaring mistakes in police/CBI investigations while investigating money laundering. Properties acquired before PMLA enforcement remain attachable as the relevant date for determining scheduled offence is when tainted property is projected as untainted, not acquisition date. PC Act provisions apply retrospectively for money laundering purposes regardless of asset acquisition timing. The court found sufficient evidence of disproportionate assets and money laundering, with appellant failing to prove legal income sources. Section 5(1) conditions were satisfied given apprehension of property alienation following FIR registration, and requirements under clauses (a) and (b) were fulfilled as appellant possessed alleged proceeds of crime with likelihood of concealment.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal held that ED need not conduct independent investigation into predicate offences, only identifying glaring mistakes in police/CBI investigations while investigating money laundering. Properties acquired before PMLA enforcement remain attachable as the relevant date for determining scheduled offence is when tainted property is projected as untainted, not acquisition date. PC Act provisions apply retrospectively for money laundering purposes regardless of asset acquisition timing. The court found sufficient evidence of disproportionate assets and money laundering, with appellant failing to prove legal income sources. Section 5(1) conditions were satisfied given apprehension of property alienation following FIR registration, and requirements under clauses (a) and (b) were fulfilled as appellant possessed alleged proceeds of crime with likelihood of concealment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
