Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal held that ED need not conduct independent investigation into predicate offences, only identifying glaring mistakes in police/CBI investigations while investigating money laundering. Properties acquired before PMLA enforcement remain attachable as the relevant date for determining scheduled offence is when tainted property is projected as untainted, not acquisition date. PC Act provisions apply retrospectively for money laundering purposes regardless of asset acquisition timing. The court found sufficient evidence of disproportionate assets and money laundering, with appellant failing to prove legal income sources. Section 5(1) conditions were satisfied given apprehension of property alienation following FIR registration, and requirements under clauses (a) and (b) were fulfilled as appellant possessed alleged proceeds of crime with likelihood of concealment.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal held that ED need not conduct independent investigation into predicate offences, only identifying glaring mistakes in police/CBI investigations while investigating money laundering. Properties acquired before PMLA enforcement remain attachable as the relevant date for determining scheduled offence is when tainted property is projected as untainted, not acquisition date. PC Act provisions apply retrospectively for money laundering purposes regardless of asset acquisition timing. The court found sufficient evidence of disproportionate assets and money laundering, with appellant failing to prove legal income sources. Section 5(1) conditions were satisfied given apprehension of property alienation following FIR registration, and requirements under clauses (a) and (b) were fulfilled as appellant possessed alleged proceeds of crime with likelihood of concealment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
