Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC set aside ex-parte assessment order for violating principles of natural justice due to improper service of show cause notice. Petitioner was unaware of notice uploaded only on GST Portal without physical service or alternative delivery methods under Section 169(1) of GST Act. Court held that merely fulfilling empty formalities through ex-parte proceedings without affording personal hearing opportunity defeats statutory purpose and creates multiplicity of litigation. Officer failed to explore prescribed alternative service modes including RPAD when initial notice method proved ineffective. Matter remanded to first respondent for fresh consideration with proper notice service, ensuring petitioner receives adequate hearing opportunity before assessment determination.
HC set aside ex-parte assessment order for violating principles of natural justice due to improper service of show cause notice. Petitioner was unaware of notice uploaded only on GST Portal without physical service or alternative delivery methods under Section 169(1) of GST Act. Court held that merely fulfilling empty formalities through ex-parte proceedings without affording personal hearing opportunity defeats statutory purpose and creates multiplicity of litigation. Officer failed to explore prescribed alternative service modes including RPAD when initial notice method proved ineffective. Matter remanded to first respondent for fresh consideration with proper notice service, ensuring petitioner receives adequate hearing opportunity before assessment determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
