Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside GST assessment order dated 27.08.2024 and Form GST DRC-07 for violating principles of natural justice. Petitioner challenged order claiming non-receipt of show cause notice uploaded only on GST Portal without personal service. Court held that mere portal upload constituted insufficient service, requiring exploration of alternative modes under Section 169(1) including RPAD when taxpayer fails to respond. Ex parte proceedings based solely on empty formalities create multiplicity of litigation and waste judicial resources. Since respondent had already recovered disputed tax from petitioner's bank account, no deposit conditions were imposed. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration with proper service of notice. Petition allowed by way of remand.
HC set aside GST assessment order dated 27.08.2024 and Form GST DRC-07 for violating principles of natural justice. Petitioner challenged order claiming non-receipt of show cause notice uploaded only on GST Portal without personal service. Court held that mere portal upload constituted insufficient service, requiring exploration of alternative modes under Section 169(1) including RPAD when taxpayer fails to respond. Ex parte proceedings based solely on empty formalities create multiplicity of litigation and waste judicial resources. Since respondent had already recovered disputed tax from petitioner's bank account, no deposit conditions were imposed. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration with proper service of notice. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
