Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2013-14, ruling that the basic requirement of "failure to disclose" was not satisfied. The assessee had disclosed expenditure towards bad debts written off in the profit and loss account, though it was also shown as provisions in the trial balance. The AO had originally considered this very ground while passing the assessment order dated 24.2.2016. The court held that the reopening notice was based on mere change of opinion, which does not constitute valid reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The petition was decided in favour of the assessee, establishing that disclosed information cannot form basis for reassessment proceedings.
The HC quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2013-14, ruling that the basic requirement of "failure to disclose" was not satisfied. The assessee had disclosed expenditure towards bad debts written off in the profit and loss account, though it was also shown as provisions in the trial balance. The AO had originally considered this very ground while passing the assessment order dated 24.2.2016. The court held that the reopening notice was based on mere change of opinion, which does not constitute valid reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The petition was decided in favour of the assessee, establishing that disclosed information cannot form basis for reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.