Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the PCIT's revision order u/s 263. The tribunal held that withdrawals from capital account cannot be treated as income and cause no prejudice to revenue. The AO had properly examined complete books of accounts including sundry creditors, receivables, and transactions with related proprietory concern. PCIT failed to establish how the assessment order was erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interest. Bank charges and interest were properly verified and allowable. The tribunal found PCIT's findings lacked adequate basis and were bad in law, reversing the revision order entirely.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the PCIT's revision order u/s 263. The tribunal held that withdrawals from capital account cannot be treated as income and cause no prejudice to revenue. The AO had properly examined complete books of accounts including sundry creditors, receivables, and transactions with related proprietory concern. PCIT failed to establish how the assessment order was erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interest. Bank charges and interest were properly verified and allowable. The tribunal found PCIT's findings lacked adequate basis and were bad in law, reversing the revision order entirely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.