Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the revision petition in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The accused admitted receiving a loan of Rs. 3 lakhs but claimed repayment without satisfactory proof. The cheque dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 of NI Act regarding cheque validity and consideration. Despite receiving legal notice, the accused could not establish payment to the complainant. The HC held all ingredients of Section 138 were satisfied, affirming the conviction and three-month imprisonment sentence. The compensation of Rs. 4.5 lakhs was deemed adequate despite being potentially low, as no appeal was filed challenging it.
The HC dismissed the revision petition in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The accused admitted receiving a loan of Rs. 3 lakhs but claimed repayment without satisfactory proof. The cheque dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 of NI Act regarding cheque validity and consideration. Despite receiving legal notice, the accused could not establish payment to the complainant. The HC held all ingredients of Section 138 were satisfied, affirming the conviction and three-month imprisonment sentence. The compensation of Rs. 4.5 lakhs was deemed adequate despite being potentially low, as no appeal was filed challenging it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
