Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the revision petition in a dishonoured cheque case under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs.2,63,216 which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 that the cheque was issued for discharge of legally enforceable debt. His defence that the cheque was blank and unsigned when given was rejected as improbable. The trial court's conviction was upheld as the accused failed to prove non-service of demand notice and did not pay the amount after deemed service. The compensation of Rs.4,80,000 awarded by the trial court, including interest and litigation costs over seven years, was deemed reasonable and not excessive, requiring no interference.
The HC dismissed the revision petition in a dishonoured cheque case under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs.2,63,216 which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 that the cheque was issued for discharge of legally enforceable debt. His defence that the cheque was blank and unsigned when given was rejected as improbable. The trial court's conviction was upheld as the accused failed to prove non-service of demand notice and did not pay the amount after deemed service. The compensation of Rs.4,80,000 awarded by the trial court, including interest and litigation costs over seven years, was deemed reasonable and not excessive, requiring no interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
