Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC set aside assessment order dated 08.08.2024 for violating principles of natural justice where petitioner received no personal hearing opportunity. Despite show cause notice being uploaded on GST Portal, petitioner claimed unawareness and non-receipt of original notice. Court held that while portal service is valid, revenue officers must explore alternative service modes under Section 169 GST Act when taxpayers remain unresponsive, preferably through RPAD, to ensure effective service rather than mere procedural compliance. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration conditional upon petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. Petition allowed by way of remand.
HC set aside assessment order dated 08.08.2024 for violating principles of natural justice where petitioner received no personal hearing opportunity. Despite show cause notice being uploaded on GST Portal, petitioner claimed unawareness and non-receipt of original notice. Court held that while portal service is valid, revenue officers must explore alternative service modes under Section 169 GST Act when taxpayers remain unresponsive, preferably through RPAD, to ensure effective service rather than mere procedural compliance. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration conditional upon petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
