Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC set aside assessment order dated 08.08.2024 for violating principles of natural justice where petitioner received no personal hearing opportunity. Despite show cause notice being uploaded on GST Portal, petitioner claimed unawareness and non-receipt of original notice. Court held that while portal service is valid, revenue officers must explore alternative service modes under Section 169 GST Act when taxpayers remain unresponsive, preferably through RPAD, to ensure effective service rather than mere procedural compliance. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration conditional upon petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. Petition allowed by way of remand.
HC set aside assessment order dated 08.08.2024 for violating principles of natural justice where petitioner received no personal hearing opportunity. Despite show cause notice being uploaded on GST Portal, petitioner claimed unawareness and non-receipt of original notice. Court held that while portal service is valid, revenue officers must explore alternative service modes under Section 169 GST Act when taxpayers remain unresponsive, preferably through RPAD, to ensure effective service rather than mere procedural compliance. Matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration conditional upon petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.