Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Revenue-neutral domestic transfer pricing and mirror transactions justified deletion of related-party adjustments for operation, maintenance and port ...
The HC disposed of a petition challenging the freezing of petitioner's bank accounts. The petitioner's grievance concerned the freezing of two additional accounts opened under the same PAN number following communication dated 16 June 2024. The court held that since an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 had been filed against the impugned Order-in-Original, the final order dated 28 January 2025 was automatically stayed. Consequently, the HC directed Kotak Mahindra Bank to immediately de-freeze all three accounts and ordered the Department to communicate with the bank to lift the debit freeze. The petition was disposed of with relief granted to the petitioner.
The HC disposed of a petition challenging the freezing of petitioner's bank accounts. The petitioner's grievance concerned the freezing of two additional accounts opened under the same PAN number following communication dated 16 June 2024. The court held that since an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 had been filed against the impugned Order-in-Original, the final order dated 28 January 2025 was automatically stayed. Consequently, the HC directed Kotak Mahindra Bank to immediately de-freeze all three accounts and ordered the Department to communicate with the bank to lift the debit freeze. The petition was disposed of with relief granted to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
