Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that assessment orders issued beyond the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act are invalid and void. The court emphasized that when the legislature incorporates amendments to existing legislation, such amendments must be interpreted purposively while considering the overall statutory scheme. The court noted that amended provisions become integral parts of the statute and cannot be interpreted in isolation from other statutory provisions. Following precedents from Kerala HC in Allianz Cornhill Information Services case and Bombay HC in Vodafone Idea Limited case, the court ruled that the Assessing Officer is statutorily bound to adhere to the time limits stipulated under Section 144C(13). Any assessment order issued in breach of these mandatory time limits shall be deemed invalid. The writ petition was allowed, affirming the strict adherence to procedural timelines in tax assessment proceedings.
The HC held that assessment orders issued beyond the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act are invalid and void. The court emphasized that when the legislature incorporates amendments to existing legislation, such amendments must be interpreted purposively while considering the overall statutory scheme. The court noted that amended provisions become integral parts of the statute and cannot be interpreted in isolation from other statutory provisions. Following precedents from Kerala HC in Allianz Cornhill Information Services case and Bombay HC in Vodafone Idea Limited case, the court ruled that the Assessing Officer is statutorily bound to adhere to the time limits stipulated under Section 144C(13). Any assessment order issued in breach of these mandatory time limits shall be deemed invalid. The writ petition was allowed, affirming the strict adherence to procedural timelines in tax assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.