Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT set aside CIT(A) order regarding cash deposits totaling Rs. 41,07,000 treated as unexplained under section 68. Assessee claimed deposits represented gifts from blood relations and agricultural income receipts but failed to provide strong arguments before lower authorities. However, ITAT accepted assessee's contention that addition should be restricted to peak credit of Rs. 15,27,000 rather than entire deposit amount. Matter remanded to AO for de-novo adjudication with directions to verify peak credit calculations and restrict addition accordingly after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing. AO instructed to examine supporting documentation and chart submitted by assessee demonstrating peak credit working. Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT set aside CIT(A) order regarding cash deposits totaling Rs. 41,07,000 treated as unexplained under section 68. Assessee claimed deposits represented gifts from blood relations and agricultural income receipts but failed to provide strong arguments before lower authorities. However, ITAT accepted assessee's contention that addition should be restricted to peak credit of Rs. 15,27,000 rather than entire deposit amount. Matter remanded to AO for de-novo adjudication with directions to verify peak credit calculations and restrict addition accordingly after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing. AO instructed to examine supporting documentation and chart submitted by assessee demonstrating peak credit working. Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
