Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credit based on seized receipt dated 13.05.2008 acknowledging "on money" of Rs. 4.25 crores. Twin assessees challenged addition claiming receipt was undated and no amount received. Tribunal rejected contentions, applying section 292C statutory presumption regarding seized documents' correctness. However, ITAT reduced total addition from Rs. 5.25 crores to Rs. 4.25 crores as per receipt amount, rejecting revenue's extrapolation. Addition apportioned equally between assessees at 50% each. CIT(A)'s restriction to Rs. 1,09,89,285 was overturned. Tribunal distinguished Bharat Engineering precedent regarding first-year business additions, noting complex web of group entity transactions. Appeals partially allowed with addition confirmed at Rs. 4.25 crores total.
ITAT upheld addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credit based on seized receipt dated 13.05.2008 acknowledging "on money" of Rs. 4.25 crores. Twin assessees challenged addition claiming receipt was undated and no amount received. Tribunal rejected contentions, applying section 292C statutory presumption regarding seized documents' correctness. However, ITAT reduced total addition from Rs. 5.25 crores to Rs. 4.25 crores as per receipt amount, rejecting revenue's extrapolation. Addition apportioned equally between assessees at 50% each. CIT(A)'s restriction to Rs. 1,09,89,285 was overturned. Tribunal distinguished Bharat Engineering precedent regarding first-year business additions, noting complex web of group entity transactions. Appeals partially allowed with addition confirmed at Rs. 4.25 crores total.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.