Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that duty drawback under Section 74 of Customs Act, 1962 is allowable only on Basic Customs Duty paid and not on total customs duties including Countervailing Duty, Special Additional Duty, and Education Cesses. Court interpreted "any duty" in Section 74 to mean duty payable under Customs Act only, excluding duties under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or other Acts. Section 2(15) definition of "duty" supports this interpretation. Petitioner had already availed Cenvat credit on CVD, SAD and Cesses under Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, but not on basic customs duty. Impugned orders modified directing authorities to recompute duty drawback considering only basic customs duty and apply Notification 23/2008 for computation period. Petition allowed by way of remand.
HC held that duty drawback under Section 74 of Customs Act, 1962 is allowable only on Basic Customs Duty paid and not on total customs duties including Countervailing Duty, Special Additional Duty, and Education Cesses. Court interpreted "any duty" in Section 74 to mean duty payable under Customs Act only, excluding duties under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or other Acts. Section 2(15) definition of "duty" supports this interpretation. Petitioner had already availed Cenvat credit on CVD, SAD and Cesses under Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, but not on basic customs duty. Impugned orders modified directing authorities to recompute duty drawback considering only basic customs duty and apply Notification 23/2008 for computation period. Petition allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.