Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging ED's retention of seized gold and jewelry in a money laundering case involving fraudulent conversion of demonetized currency. The appellant allegedly facilitated RTGS entries for jewellers to convert demonetized Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes into gold through front company accounts at Axis Bank. The tribunal held that absence of police charge sheet does not entitle relief until closure report filing and acceptance. The delivery of jewelry post-demonetization on 08.11.2016 evidenced accommodation entries provided for commission in furtherance of conspiracy. The seized gold constituted prima facie proceeds of crime under PMLA provisions. The retention order remained valid despite procedural delays, with appellant granted liberty to claim seized materials upon acquittal from the Special Judge PMLA Court.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging ED's retention of seized gold and jewelry in a money laundering case involving fraudulent conversion of demonetized currency. The appellant allegedly facilitated RTGS entries for jewellers to convert demonetized Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes into gold through front company accounts at Axis Bank. The tribunal held that absence of police charge sheet does not entitle relief until closure report filing and acceptance. The delivery of jewelry post-demonetization on 08.11.2016 evidenced accommodation entries provided for commission in furtherance of conspiracy. The seized gold constituted prima facie proceeds of crime under PMLA provisions. The retention order remained valid despite procedural delays, with appellant granted liberty to claim seized materials upon acquittal from the Special Judge PMLA Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
