Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the appeal, finding no sufficient cause to condone the 7-month and 20-day delay in filing. Despite medical prescriptions explaining partial delay, the court held that as a partnership firm, other partners could have acted. The petitioner failed to provide a comprehensive explanation for the entire delay period. The court emphasized that statutory service through portal upload is valid, and supplementary communications are facilitative. Applying Section 107(4), the appellate authority's refusal to extend time limitation was deemed consistent with fiscal discipline and procedural mandates, warranting no judicial intervention under constitutional review.
HC dismissed the appeal, finding no sufficient cause to condone the 7-month and 20-day delay in filing. Despite medical prescriptions explaining partial delay, the court held that as a partnership firm, other partners could have acted. The petitioner failed to provide a comprehensive explanation for the entire delay period. The court emphasized that statutory service through portal upload is valid, and supplementary communications are facilitative. Applying Section 107(4), the appellate authority's refusal to extend time limitation was deemed consistent with fiscal discipline and procedural mandates, warranting no judicial intervention under constitutional review.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
