Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
