Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
